The War for America: The Fight for Independence, 1775–1783. For accounts emphasizing the contingent nature of the war, Ferling 2007, Griffith 2002, and Black 1998 are useful studies.īlack, Jeremy. For a thematic understanding of American military policies and practices, see Higginbotham 1983. Middleton 2012 offers a fresh perspective on the war in an Atlantic context. British conduct of the war is treated in Robson 1955 in chapters that might be read separately, while Mackesy 1993 analyzes the war through British strategic concerns, integrating ministerial politics. Middlekauff 2005 is a broad but sophisticated narrative of Revolutionary America. Necessarily, any bibliography dealing with a subject examined so often, and so well, must be highly selective. Standing back, these three broad threads, each distinctive, but not without some degree of overlap, constitute the main thrusts in the history of the American War of Independence. Naturally, social and cultural histories have also played a role in the direction and shape of scholarship, such as in Caroline Cox’s A Proper Sense of Honor ( Cox 2004, cited under Continental Army), which clearly evinces the impact of Royster 1979. One of the more significant works, Brendan Simms’s Three Victories and a Defeat ( Simms 2009, cited under Diplomacy), places the war within Britain’s larger diplomatic and grand strategic context. Political and diplomatic emphases continue as a vibrant subset. Wayne Carp’s To Starve the Army at Pleasure ( Carp 1984, cited under Continental Army) overlaps the political realm. One landmark study, Charles Royster’s A Revolutionary People at War ( Royster 1979, cited under Continental Army), considers military service within a cultural context, while E. Some works purposefully overlap with the other concentrations-political and diplomatic, and social and cultural. Almost a Miracle by John Ferling (see Ferling 2007, cited under General Overviews) stands out for its breadth and its stress on the war’s contingent nature.

The first, a traditional vein, lends itself to the operational and institutional realms of the war, those of campaigns, battles, logistics, and of the armies and navies. Three broad concentrations characterize histories of the American War of Independence. Indeed, in the years since the rise of new military history in the 1960s and 1970s, academic historians have entered the fray and contributed deeper analyses and more sophisticated, critical, and nuanced narratives to the field. What had once been the preserve of popular writers trumpeting American battlefield prowess against British military conservatism has become an increasingly sophisticated field of study, albeit not without its professional challenges.